NVESTIGATIVE

CIENCE

EARNING

NVIRONMENT

 

 

 

Bevel: ABOUT
ISLE

Bevel: ISLE DEVELOPERS

Bevel: ISLE
USERS

Bevel: ISLE ASSESSMENT

Bevel: ISLE CURRICULUM

Bevel: ISLE
LABS

Bevel: ISLE IN PRACTICE

 

 

 

*   Richard Therkon, Ed.M.

*   Physics Teacher

*   Plainsboro High School North

*   90 Grovers Mill Rd

*   Plainsboro, NJ 08536

*   (609) 716-5100

 

 

       As a first year teacher at West Windsor Plainsboro High School North, I have had the freedom to pursue inquiry based learning as my means of educating.  The most effective method I have used is the ISLE cycle, Investigative Science Learning Environment.  ISLE is a guided discovery teaching method in which the facilitator creates an environment in which the students can discover various concepts of physics on their own and then apply this knowledge to construct other concepts.  Lessons build upon the knowledge they have constructed and motivate students to further investigate phenomenon. 

       In my classroom I started right away with ISLE with a very memorable lesson I witnessed while studying at Rutgers University, the TV lesson.  Seemingly unrelated to science in anyway my students are asked to come up with explanations for a strange observation, their teacher has 17 televisions!  The students eagerly add their own personal explanation for this and are then asked to come up with ways to test their ideas by trying to disprove it.  Many ideas are put to the test in this way and the students become very excited about being able to have some control over the way the class runs. 

       In this way, the simple yet seemingly unscientific activity creates an ISLE cycle that parallels the thought process of scientists who do research in astrophysics.  The students start with an observation or real world phenomenon and then try to explain this phenomenon.  Following this explanation, the students then use logic and hypothetical-deductive reasoning to attempt to disprove their ideas by making a prediction based on their explanation.  The students can then “perform” the experiment and then make a judgment about whether or not they were correct, possibly and most likely, revising their explanation to return to the start of the cycle and try to disprove again.

       A particularly memorable day for me was when my students were studying Newton’s laws of motion.  My students were trying to decide how force and motion were related to each other.  One group of students suggested to the others the object of interest that experiences a force moves in the direction of the force.  A second group of students stated then, “but if that were true and if we were to have two people push on our object, then it would move in the direction in which it experiences the bigger force.”  A few more tests were offered and more revisions to their explanation were made and the students eventually came to the conclusion that the object does not move in the direction of the net force, but it accelerates in that direction. 

       While I would love units to run as smoothly as the Newton’s laws did all the time, some units become very hard for the students and often times they get very frustrated with the topics and lose motivation.  It is also often times very difficult to both challenge the students who construct the concepts very quickly and to not overwhelm and leave the zone of proximal development for the students who can struggle with mathematics, or steps in problem solving.  With some careful planning these difficulties in using ISLE can be overcome.

       Knowing that the students are going to find a particular concept hard is key to being able to prepare something that they will get “hooked” in by.  Often times I like to include something cool and tell the students by the end of class they will be able to explain what happened and why.  Looking back at this year, I am proud to say I did this the best with electric fields.  I showed video clips to my students of a car being struck by lighting, but the people inside were not harmed.  The fact this was cognitively dissonant event got the entire class interested in what was happening.  The student motivation soared and I was able to motivate the students to work hard on figuring out a concept many of my colleagues told me was very difficult for students. 

       Besides motivation, the other hardest thing to work around is the differences in levels of ability.  I wanted to be able to challenge my stronger students but at the same time not lose the students who had particular weaknesses.  The Group aspect of ISLE is great for this since students who are weaker in certain areas are able to get help from students who are stronger in those areas.  It is very rewarding to see these students working together to improve and impressive still to see these students start to use the same methods in helping each other that I use myself when teaching! 

       Although group work is a good way for weaker students to improve, it is also important to offer extra ways for students to practice their skills. A friend of mine and fellow ISLE teacher, Chris D’amato, shared with me a table/steps method of helping students work through problems. I added and modified problems to the work he sent me and used it with my struggling students.  I noticed there was a huge change in their moral and interest in the subject after they had more experience and practice with the structured methods of problem solving and some of my students who used to be weak are now the strongest in the class.  With this success I was inspired to construct useful practice formats for all of my students in other units such as ray Diagrams in geometrical optics.

 

Links:

·       ISLE papers

·       Physics video website

·       Scientific abilities

·       ActivPhysics

 

 

 

Bevel: HOME

Bevel: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS